Grow My Therapy

Grow My Therapy

Grow My Therapy — done-for-you writing for psychotherapy practices

Blog writing for psychotherapists, where the prose is the evidence.

For most practices, writing is a marketing channel. For yours it is closer to a work sample. A prospective long-term client reads your pages the way one might read a letter from a stranger they are considering trusting — looking less for information than for whether this is someone who could hear the actual thing.

Which sets an uncomfortably high bar. Characterless content published under your name does more damage than an empty blog, and both of us should be honest about that before starting.

Substantial pieces a year, not fifty thin ones
4–6Substantial pieces a year, not fifty thin ones
Writing sample everything is built from
1Writing sample everything is built from
Mechanical checks before you see a draft
19Mechanical checks before you see a draft
Revisions until it sounds like you
Revisions until it sounds like you

The one you are already thinking

Can somebody else write this, and should they?

It is the right question and it deserves a direct answer rather than a reassurance. If what you want is a paragraph that only you could have written — a description of something you noticed after twenty years — then no, we cannot produce that from nothing, and we would not pretend to.

What we can do is two things. First, take writing you have already done — unfinished, unpublished, notes for a talk, a long email — and turn it into a properly structured, internally linked, findable piece of work. Most psychotherapists have more of this material than they realise, sitting in files.

Second, draft the pieces that do not need to be uniquely yours: what a first consultation involves, how you work, what the frame means in practice, why long-term work differs from short-term work. Those are necessary, they are what people actually search for, and they are also the ones you have been putting off for two years.

The honest division: the distinctive writing should be yours. The structural writing does not have to be, and it is what is currently missing.

How much, how often

Four to six pieces a year, and that is not a compromise

Content advice built for volume businesses does not transfer to a practice that needs a handful of new clients a year. Publishing weekly would produce fifty pieces you do not stand behind, and search engines have become considerably better at recognising the difference between coverage and substance.

A small number of genuinely good pieces, each properly built and linked into the rest of your site, outperforms a high cadence of thin ones — in rankings, and much more so in whether the reader who arrives decides to write to you.

It also suits a practice that would rather not think about marketing. Four pieces a year is a conversation every few months, not an ongoing obligation, and it accumulates into something substantial over the timescale a psychotherapy practice actually operates on.

What a year usually looks like

  • One piece on how you work and what the frame involves
  • One on what a first consultation is actually like, linked from the site
  • One or two on the difficulties you most often see, described rather than solved
  • One on why previous therapy may not have helped
  • Anything of your own we can finish and publish properly
  • All of it internally linked, so it feeds your search visibility

The exclusions

The content conventions that would cost you this reader

Standard practice in content marketing includes several moves that a careful reader treats as diagnostic information about the practitioner.

No client material

No vignettes, no composites, no “a client once said”. In depth work the details that make an example vivid are the identifying ones, and the person may well read it.

No listicles

Seven signs, five ways, three things. The format flattens exactly the kind of thinking you are trying to demonstrate, and it reads as generic within one line.

No promised outcomes

No claims about what therapy achieves or how long it takes to feel better. What works better is describing what the process asks of someone.

No keyword-shaped sentences

If a phrase would make a sentence read oddly, it does not go in. A page written for a machine loses precisely the reader who would have stayed three years.

The process

From something you already wrote to something published properly

The starting material is yours. What we add is structure, checking and the technical work that makes a piece findable.

  1. 01

    Your writing, in whatever state

    Finished or not, published or not. Notes for a talk count. This is both the voice sample and, frequently, the first article.

    The most important step

  2. 02

    A conversation about the work

    How you describe what you do aloud, which phrases you return to, what you find yourself explaining in every consultation.

    Recorded, so you never repeat it

  3. 03

    Your brief

    Terminology, what you will not write about, your disclaimer, your contact wording, and anything your registering body restricts.

    Enforced on every draft thereafter

  4. 04

    Drafting

    Written in your rhythm and at your length — which for most psychotherapists means longer paragraphs and fewer subheadings than the internet prefers.

    Structured, not chopped up

  5. 05

    Checks before you see it

    Sources, terminology, banned phrases, forbidden topics, crisis resources, disclaimer, internal links that actually resolve.

    Failing a check means it does not reach you

  6. 06

    Your revision, then publication

    Revisions are unlimited and expected. Corrections go into the brief so the next piece starts closer.

    Nothing publishes without your yes

Questions we get

What psychotherapists ask us about this

Will this sound like me or like a content agency?

It depends almost entirely on the sample, which is why we ask for one before quoting rather than after. Drafts are built from your sentence rhythm, your vocabulary and how much you hedge — not from a template with your name applied.

The first piece will need correcting. If after two pieces it still does not sound like you, that is a signal the arrangement is not working and we would say so.

Is it ethical to publish writing I did not draft?

It is standard across the professions, and what makes it defensible is that the thinking is yours, you approve every word, and you would stand behind it in front of a colleague. Where practitioners feel differently — and some do, seriously — the honest alternative is that we edit and publish your own writing rather than drafting it.

We are comfortable with either. What we would not do is publish under your name something you have not read.

My registering body has rules about advertising. Does that affect this?

It can, particularly around testimonials, claims about efficacy and how a practice describes its competence. Tell us which body you are registered with and what its wording says, and those constraints go into the brief and are enforced mechanically rather than remembered.

Where we cannot verify a rule, we flag it and ask rather than assuming.

Do I need to write about my theoretical orientation?

One piece, for the small number of people searching a tradition by name and for referring colleagues. It should not be the front door — most readers cannot evaluate an orientation and are not trying to. Descriptions of what actually happens in the room do more work and reach more people.

Would these become social media posts?

They can — a paragraph from a piece is better social content than anything composed for the platform. Whether that is worth doing depends on whether you want to be on those platforms at all, which is discussed honestly on social media for psychotherapists.

Send us something you started and never finished.

Most psychotherapists have several. One of them is probably the best page your site could have, and it needs an afternoon of structure rather than a year of intention. See everything we do for psychotherapists.

No obligation · we will say if your own writing is better than ours